U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

School Violence and the Zero Tolerance Alternative: Some Principles and Policy Prescriptions

NCJ Number
165095
Author(s)
T Gabor
Date Published
1995
Length
42 pages
Annotation
This investigation into school violence in Canada examined the cause and incidence of school violence, how to respond to school violence, what Canadians understand zero tolerance to mean, and whether zero tolerance decreases the incidence of school violence.
Abstract
The study began with cross-Canada focus groups with police, teachers, and youth. This was followed by surveys of police, school officials, the general public, and the print media. Participants in surveys and focus groups were convinced that school violence is more serious now than it was 10 years ago. Most school misconduct is verbal abuse, bullying, and disorderly behavior, but it also extends to vandalism, ethnic-based gang activity, and stealing. Research participants believed that a small core of students is violent and malicious, but this core attracts followers. There was a good deal of support for zero tolerance policies, but the definition of such policies varied considerably among study participants. In most cases, participants defined zero tolerance as delineating clear lines for acceptable behavior, along with consequences for violating specified rules. They favored a swift, sure response to violence, tempered with discretion, especially for milder offenses. Suggestions are offered for the appropriate role for Solicitor General Canada in dealing with school violence, and nine guidelines are presented for the response of police and school officials. Appended methodology and survey data