U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Is There a "Second Generation" of Shock Incarceration Facilities?: The Evolving Nature of Goals, Program Elements, and Drug Treatment Services in Boot Camp Programs (From Intermediate Sanctions: Sentencing in the 1990s, P 89-111, 1995, John Ortiz Smykla and William L Selke, eds. -- See NCJ-167581)

NCJ Number
167586
Author(s)
L A Gransky; T C Castellano; E L Cowles
Date Published
1995
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This paper presents data on the goal-orientations of individuals responsible for the operations of boot camps, and the delivery of specific services are reported to clarify the correctional philosophies that underlie shock incarceration (SI) program interventions; Also, preliminary data on drug treatment programming in SI facilities are presented.
Abstract
A variety of survey techniques were used in the research. Data were collected in two stages. The first stage focused on the person at the system level most directly responsible for the planning, implementation, or oversight of SI programming. The second stage targeted the site-level administrator and substance abuse treatment/education provider. The purpose of this two-stage data collection was to ascertain the amount of congruence in the perceptions held by individuals responsible for the programming at differing levels of correctional systems. The survey results suggest that SI facilities are anchored in an adherence to rehabilitative ideology and that a strong emphasis has been placed on promoting offender change. This trend reflects the emergence of "second generation" SI programs that are moving away from a basic military model and toward a more therapeutically oriented regimen. An examination of drug treatment programming in SI facilities suggests that despite an increasing emphasis on drug treatment programming, there is still confusion as to what constitutes such programming in SI facilities. 6 tables and 1 figure

Downloads

No download available