The case described a child aged 6-8 years, 9-11 years, or 12-14 years who had allegedly been sexually abused by a stranger. The only evidence was the child's uncorroborated testimony. Participants were college students. They were asked to rate the believability and importance of the child's testimony. They were also asked to assign a percentage of blame to the victim and to determine a verdict in the case. Results unexpectedly revealed no main effects of the victim's age. However, as expected, significant sex differences occurred for some of the case outcome variables. Males tended to rate the child's testimony as less believable and less important than did females. In addition, males tended to assign more blame to the victim and yielded fewer guilty verdicts than did females. Results indicated no interactions between the sex of the juror and the age of the victim. Findings suggest a relationship between juror sex and perception of uncorroborated child testimony in cases of child sexual abuse. Table and 37 references (Author abstract modified)