U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Drug Court Survey Report, 1997, Volume II: Justice Agency Perspectives; Prosecution, Defense, Law Enforcement and Corrections

NCJ Number
168282
Author(s)
C S Cooper; S R Bartlett; M A Shaw; K K Yang
Date Published
1997
Length
155 pages
Annotation
This second volume of a four-volume report on the findings of the 1997 Drug Court Survey provides information on the drug court activities and perspectives of prosecutors, public defenders, law enforcement officials, and correctional agency administrators involved with drug courts in their jurisdictions.
Abstract
Regarding program effectiveness, the prosecutors provide information on the criteria used to assess drug court effectiveness, the impact of the drug court on the prosecutor's office's ability to handle criminal cases and functions, the benefits prosecutors have derived from the drug court program, the relationship of the drug court program with community prosecution activities, and drug caseload activity trends since the drug court was initiated. Prosecutors also comment on the costs for the drug court program as well as program implementation and operational issues. Defense counsel also comment on the criteria for measuring court effectiveness as well as the defense office's ability to handle criminal caseloads and functions. Benefits derived from the court are also addressed. Defense counsel perspectives on costs to the indigent defense office for the drug court and program implementation and operational issues are included. Similar perspectives are provided for law enforcement officials, with attention to such issues as the program's impact on arrest policies and procedures, officer training, community relations, and community policing activities. Changes in drug-related arrests since the drug court began are also considered. The perspectives of corrections agencies also encompass criteria for assessing effectiveness, the court's impact on its operations, costs, and program implementation and planning issues. The latter issues for all respondent categories address problems encountered and their resolution, most significant benefits, unanticipated issues, suggestions for improvement, and advice to agencies in other jurisdictions.