skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 168944     Find in a Library
  Title: Managing Prison Growth in North Carolina Through Structured Sentencing
  Document URL: Text PDF 
  Author(s): R F Wright
  Date Published: 1998
  Page Count: 16
  Series: NIJ Program Focus
  Annotation: The North Carolina General Assembly and the State Sentencing and Policy Advisory Committee have worked together to design a sentencing structure that increases certainty and length of imprisonment for the most serious felonies and that creatively uses community and intermediate sanctions for lesser offenses to control corrections costs.
  Abstract: As an alternative to indeterminate sentencing, structured sentencing is a compromise between individualized assessment of each offender and uniform treatment of persons charged with an offense under legislatively mandated determinate sentencing. Structured sentencing creates a set of sentencing rules, usually called guidelines, that consider both the offense and personal characteristics of the offender. While general rules of a structured sentencing system make sentences more uniform and less subject to the individual discretion of judges and parole boards, such a system allows judges to impose different sentences in special cases. Structured sentencing makes it possible to plan correctional resources and minimize prison overcrowding. Structured sentencing in North Carolina has been accomplished using the following methods: (1) sentencing commission use of legislatively mandated impact statements to inform legislators of prison construction costs associated with amending sentencing statutes; (2) training in the use of sentencing guidelines for members of the criminal justice community; (3) cooperation between sentencing commission and criminal justice professionals; and (4) integration of budget requests of community corrections agencies into a unified budget. An evaluation is planned to assess the effects of structured sentencing. The development of sentencing guidelines in North Carolina between 1990 and 1993 and sentencing guideline changes in 1994 and 1995 legislative sessions are described. Lessons from North Carolina's experience with structured sentencing that may be applicable to other jurisdictions are discussed. 12 notes, 5 exhibits, and 3 photographs
  Main Term(s): Courts
  Index Term(s): Indeterminate sentences ; Determinate Sentencing ; Sentencing guidelines ; Corrections effectiveness ; Prison overcrowding ; Sentence effectiveness ; Intermediate sanctions ; North Carolina
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
United States of America
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: National Institute of Justice Program Focus
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.