U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Pretreatment Dropouts: Characteristics and Outcomes (From Intensive Outpatient Treatment for the Addictions, P 1-14, 1997, Edward Gottheil and Barry Stimmel, eds. -- See NCJ-169074)

NCJ Number
169075
Author(s)
E Gottheil; R C Sterling; S P Weinstein
Date Published
1997
Length
14 pages
Annotation
Characteristics and outcome results of 12 cocaine-dependent patients who dropped out of treatment following intake, without returning for even one treatment visit, were compared with results of 324 patients who returned and received at least one treatment service and 118 patients who remained in treatment for 2 months or more.
Abstract
Volunteers for the project were recruited from individuals entering the Jefferson Outpatient Cocaine Treatment Clinic in Philadelphia who met the following criteria: first admission, above 18 years of age, and DSM-III-R diagnosis of cocaine dependence. In addition, patients were selected who were not overtly psychotic, actively suicidal, or cognitively impaired to the extent of not being able to participate in the project. Initial and follow-up assessments revealed pretreatment dropouts were more often positive for cocaine on admission drug screens and less often employed. They reported fewer psychological symptoms on scales of the Symptom Checklist and received lower scores on the medical problem severity scale of the Addiction Severity Index. At 9-month follow-up, they were found to have less often attended self-help meetings or continued in outpatient treatment, more often to have been admitted for inpatient treatment or been in jail, less often returned to school, and more often used cocaine. The authors conclude clinicians and researchers need a better understanding of patients who account for significant attrition in drug treatment programs, have distinguishing characteristics, and do much more poorly than those who remain in treatment. 24 references and 2 tables