U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Cordless Telephones: If You Can't Say Something Nice, You Might Want to Send a Letter

NCJ Number
170729
Journal
Criminal Law Bulletin Volume: 32 Issue: 5 Dated: (September-October 1996) Pages: 403-424
Author(s)
C M Bast
Date Published
1996
Length
22 pages
Annotation
This article provides information on cordless telephones and reviews case law on their use.
Abstract
Scanners that are widely available to the general public at local electronics stores can easily pick up cordless telephone conversations. Many scanner enthusiasts do not realize that the Federal wiretap law was amended in 1994 to protect cordless telephone conversations from interception. In a "triumph of politics over technology" intentional interception subjects the scanner enthusiast to potential criminal penalties and civil damages. In addition to reviewing case law on the use of cordless telephones, the article reviews Federal wiretap law and State wiretapping statutes, proposes changes to the law, and examines cordless telephone technology. Prior to the 1994 amendment to the Federal Act, State legislatures and courts had slowly begun to recognize that cordless telephone conversations deserve some protection, although they were loathe to criminalize inadvertent interception or hamper law enforcement activities to any great extent. Although legally protected, two parties desiring privacy should use land line telephones or the new generation of cordless or cellular telephones. Notes, appendix