U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Social and Economic Stress, Child Neglect and Juvenile Delinquency

NCJ Number
170879
Author(s)
D Weatherburn; B Lind
Date Published
1997
Length
63 pages
Annotation
This Australian study examined how much of the effect of economic and social disadvantage on aggregate-level variation in crime can be explained in terms of their effect on rates of child neglect and/or abuse.
Abstract
The measures of neglect and abuse were based on alleged neglect or abuse reported to the New South Wales Department of Community Services. The measures of juvenile participation in crime were based on appearance before the Children's Court for property or violent offenses. Socioeconomic data were obtained from the "Community Profile," a set of tabulations of 1991 census data published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The data were analyzed separately for urban and rural areas. The main method of analysis was fitting linear regression models. A path analysis was also undertaken. The study tested four hypotheses. First, there is a positive relationship between an area's level of social and economic stress and its level of juvenile participation in crime. Second, there is a positive relationship between an area's level of social and economic stress and its rates of child neglect and abuse. Third, the effects of social and economic stress on juvenile participation in crime are mediated mostly through the effects of social and economic stress on rates of child neglect and abuse. Fourth, the relationship posited in the third hypothesis holds up for participation in both property and violent offenses. By and large, the four hypotheses are all strongly supported by the urban analyses. There were a number of differences between the results of the rural and urban analyses. The most notable are the lower correlations between all pairs of relevant variables; the fact that in the presence of single parent families and crowded dwellings, neither of the economic stress measures (poverty and unemployment) are significant predictors of abuse, and the fact that single parent families and crowded dwellings explain only a small proportion of the variation in rates of neglect and abuse. Further, a much smaller proportion of the variation in juvenile participation in crime could be explained in rural areas. These findings highlight the importance to long-term crime prevention of reducing the level of poverty and unemployment, enhancing the social supports available to those who face poverty and unemployment, and using early intervention programs known to improve the quality of parenting behavior. 12 notes, 104 references, and a list of offense types included in the study