The research focused on 293 victims of robbery, nonsexual assault, and burglary who went through the intake procedure in the Bronx court between July 1988 and April 1989. The victims were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) those who were interviewed and for whom a victim impact statement was written and distributed to the prosecutor, the defense attorney, and the judge; (2) those who were interviewed but for whom no statement was written; and (3) those for whom only the name and address were recorded. Results revealed that the statements did not result in harsher sentences. In addition, the statements did not produce sentencing decisions that reflected more clearly the effects of crime on victims. Findings indicated that victim impact statements neither increased officials' consideration of harm to victims nor resulted in generally harsher sentencing decisions. Further research is recommended. Footnotes, tables, 2 case citations, and 22 references (Author abstract modified)