Conventional wisdom on excessive caseloads holds caseload pressure largely responsible for a variety of administrative shortcomings in almost every stage of the criminal justice process. In addition, conventional wisdom indicates the frequent result of caseload pressure is that many defenders escape prosecution and contends heavy caseloads foster judicial practices that promote less time-consuming dispositions and contribute to "routinized" and often uninformed administrative decision-making. Conventional wisdom also shows caseload pressure produces a sense of frustration and disillusionment that adversely affects the performance of police officers, prosecutors, defense counsel, and judges. This effect on performance contributes to loss of respect for the criminal justice process. The impact of heavy caseloads is examined in relation to criminal justice administration and resources, defendant rights, effective enforcement of criminal laws, and legal requirements. Legal challenges to conventional wisdom on excessive criminal justice caseloads are examined. 56 footnotes