U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Attacks on Judges: Why They Fail

NCJ Number
172240
Journal
Judicature Volume: 81 Issue: 4 Dated: (January-February 1998) Pages: 150-155
Author(s)
B Friedman
Date Published
1998
Length
6 pages
Annotation
Judges are sometimes attacked because the public perceives they are interfering with the proper workings of democracy and believes the judiciary should be independent.
Abstract
Attacks on judges are invariably political but not necessarily partisan, and challenges to judicial independence have come from both liberals and conservatives. Complaints about judges seem to primarily involve individual judicial decisions. Many approaches to control the Federal judiciary have been proposed throughout U.S. history, and attempting to strip the courts of jurisdiction has also been popular. History suggests that almost every attempt to interfere with judicial independence has failed and that citizens believe "ordinary processes" for controlling judges and the judiciary should prevail. These processes include the appellate process and the Federal judge appointment and confirmation process.