U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Language and Communication in Prison

NCJ Number
174698
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 60 Issue: 4 Dated: December 1996 Pages: 45-50
Author(s)
P M Wittenberg
Date Published
1996
Length
6 pages
Annotation
The types of special languages that occur in correctional settings and the links between language and the process of communication are discussed.
Abstract
Prison language has its roots in codes and secret communications that allowed criminals to communicate with each other in privacy; this language is called argot. Criminal cant is similar to argot except that it is a temporary form of language that changes quickly. Other forms of language in correctional institutions include idiom, slang, acronyms, abbreviations, metaphors, similes, jargon, private languages, and patois. Corrections is a communication-intensive profession. The functions of language include the communication of ideas, emotional expression, social interaction, using the power of sound, controlling reality, recording facts, expression of thought, and expression of identity. Language and communication in prison are strongly related to the context, including the settings, the participants, and the activity. A significant barrier to inmate-staff communications is the distrusted source barrier. Other barriers include those related to defensive behavior, distorted perceptions, erroneous translation, distortions from the past, and lack of congruence. Understanding inmate communication processes and the barriers that lead to communication collapse is imperative for the continued orderly running of a correctional facility and to aid personnel in responding to inmate issues. 13 references