skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 175724     Find in a Library
  Title: Reforming Sentencing and Corrections for Just Punishment and Public Safety, Research in Brief
  Document URL: Text PDF 
  Author(s): Michael E. Smith ; Walter J. Dickey
  Date Published: 1999
  Page Count: 12
  Series: NIJ Research in Brief
  Annotation: This analysis of sentencing and corrections policies concludes that public safety would be improved by major restructuring of penal and corrections law, correctional strategies, and penal measures and uses Wisconsin as an example of the development of a new framework for managing correctional resources.
  Abstract: The discussion focuses on the concepts of rule-of-law sentencing, the shifts required in correctional agencies under rule-of-law sentencing, and the changes in managing correctional resources in a Milwaukee neighborhood as a result of the efforts of the Wisconsin Governor's Task Force on Sentencing and Corrections. The discussion defines public safety as the degree to which people and property are free from the threat of harm in particular places and at particular times. Creating public safety requires the involvement of parents, neighbors, schools, churches, athletic teams, community service groups, and the labor market; it rarely requires the involvement of criminal justice personnel. Public safety also requires imposing penal measures on convicted offenders, but it cannot be achieved by that means. Among the principles that should guide corrections agencies that embrace a public safety mission are that the nature and degree of supervision of an offender should be directly related to the risk of harm the offender poses if unsupervised and that corrections agencies should not adopt strategies and programs that conflict with naturally occurring forces of social control that can be found in every neighborhood. The Wisconsin experience demonstrates how public safety would be advanced by fundamental amendments in the mission and methods of a correctional agency and that it is possible to specify the redeployment of authority and resources required for such a change. Chart, message from the NIJ Director, members of the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections, and 7 reference notes
  Main Term(s): Court reform
  Index Term(s): Judicial discretion ; Interagency cooperation ; Corrections management ; Correctional reform ; Corrections effectiveness ; Sentencing reform ; Sentencing factors ; Corrections policies ; Informal social control ; Wisconsin
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Contract Number: 97-MU-MU-K006
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: From NIJ Sentencing & Corrections, No. 4, September 1999
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.