U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Alternatives to Custody for High-Risk Young Offenders: The Multisystemic Therapy Approach

NCJ Number
176170
Journal
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Dated: 1998 Pages: 545-560
Author(s)
A W Leschied; A Cunningham
Date Published
1998
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This article describes the implementation of randomized trials of a community-based therapeutic intervention for young people in Ontario, Canada, who may be candidates for custodial sentences because of the severity or persistence of their criminal behavior.
Abstract
The use of custodial sentences to prevent youth crime in Canada has been part of the Canadian juvenile justice system since the enactment of the Youth Offenders Act (YOA) in 1984. In recent years, Federal attempts have been made to change the YOA to lessen the possibility that sentencing judges will order custody. Since 1995, the desirability of alternatives to custody has been clearly articulated in the YOA. In addition, judges contemplating custody must order a predisposition report written by a probation officer. The multisystemic therapy (MST) approach is being evaluated as a community-based option that focuses on a social-ecological approach to understanding antisocial behavior. The underlying premise of MST is that criminal conduct is multicausal; therefore, effective interventions must recognize this fact and address multiple sources of criminogenic influence. The implementation of MST in Ontario, Canada, is being evaluated using scientific methods that include random assignment, a control group, a large sample, and long-term follow-up. Outcome data for the first cohort of cases are to be reported in 1999. In support of alternatives to custody, the authors believe positive outcomes are best achieved by targeting the needs of high-risk youth, community safety is promoted by addressing the problems of youth in their natural environments, and effectiveness is best achieved using services with clear track records of positive outcomes as identified in rigorous outcome evaluations. 28 references