U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Questioning Authorized Truth: Resisting the Pull of the Policy Audience and Fostering Correctional Medical Research--A Reply to Kerle et al.

NCJ Number
180342
Journal
Justice Quarterly Volume: 16 Issue: 4 Dated: December 1999 Pages: 907-918
Author(s)
Michael S. Vaughn; Linda G. Smith
Editor(s)
Finn-Aage Esbensen
Date Published
1999
Length
12 pages
Annotation
The authors claim correctional health care needs significant improvement, and they respond to critics of that claim and discuss concepts of penal harm and penal managerialism.
Abstract
The authors present a "penal harm medicine" hypothesis in their research on correctional health care and they distinguish between penal harm and penal managerialism concepts. These concepts are related, however, in that they produce similar effects on inmate conditions of confinement. The penal harm concept recognizes that the incarceration experience is intended to harm. Moreover, penal harm advocates strive to make incarceration as harsh as possible. The penal managerialism concept is more concerned with efficiently managing burgeoning aggregate inmate populations according to principles of actuarial justice and risk management. The authors respond to specific criticisms of their research findings. 32 references and 7 footnotes