skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 181413     Find in a Library
Title: But They All Come Back: Rethinking Prisoner Reentry, Research in Brief
  Document URL: Text PDF 
Author(s): Jeremy Travis
Date Published: 05/2000
Page Count: 10
  Series: NIJ Research in Brief
  Annotation: After examining the current status of efforts to manage the reentry of ex-inmates into society upon release from prison, this paper proposes a new model for reentry management.
Abstract: Under current popular efforts to abolish parole, it has lost its effectiveness as reentry manager. At the same time, important innovations are occurring that suggest different opportunities and risks for managing reentry in new ways. The drug treatment continuum, for example, mixes treatment processes with criminal justice processes to achieve successful reentry by reducing drug use and recidivism. Recent policies on sex offenders, however, show how policy shifts and new legal doctrines can militate against successful reentry. Innovative programs that manage community supervision to achieve public safety show how a variety of criminal justice agencies can enforce the terms of reentry. Restorative justice programs are defining new roles for victims, families, and offenders, as well as for judges, police officers, and others in shaping the terms of reentry. Under the new reentry model proposed in this paper, the role of reentry management is assigned to the sentencing judge, whose duties would be expanded to create a "reentry court." At the time of sentencing, the judge would also convene the stakeholders who would be responsible for the offender's reentry. This judge-centered model borrows from the drug-court format. Both feature an ongoing central role for the judge, a "contract" drawn up between court and offender, discretion on the judge's part to impose graduated sanctions for various levels of failure to meet the conditions imposed, and the promise of the end of supervision as an occasion for ceremonial recognition. 23 notes
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Judges ; Post-release programs ; Abolishment of parole ; Aftercare decisionmaking
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Contract Number: 97-MUMU-K006
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: From Sentencing and Corrections Issues for the 21st Century, Papers From the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections, No. 7, May 2000
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.