The research tested the common assumption that what victims least need is to go to court. Preliminary results of the surveys revealed that victims who pursued civil remedies wanted more than money. They often were seeking a public affirmation of the wrong that they suffered. They sought to be heard. Findings prompted further analysis of the ways in which the traditional adversarial system may be silencing the victims and therefore may produce nontherapeutic effects. Findings suggest the need for several adjustments to the civil hearing process in terms of judicial practice, the attorney’s role, and the use of expert evidence. Findings also suggest the need for further exploration of the role of punitive damages in the context of sexual battery claims, with emphasis on affirming the victim’s voice and not silencing or belittling it. Findings indicated that the current issue is no longer whether victims should be encouraged to take part in the civil or compensation process; instead, the issue is how to improve the processes to keep their antitherapeutic effects to a minimum. Footnotes (Author abstract modified)