A standard of the best interests of the child generally governs child custody and child visitation cases. However, the parents’ interests usually guide judges’ decisions on custody and visitation in cases involving domestic assault. Two different perspectives have guided judges’ decisions in the context of domestic violence. Battered women’s advocates argue that children experience psychological harm and are at risk of physical harm. In contrast, fathers’ rights advocates argue that fathers have a right to custody and that children benefit from contact with their fathers after divorce. Mandated batterer treatment and supervised visitation would allow children the opportunity for continued contact with their fathers. In addition, mandatory judicial education and training would help judges make more effective and sensitive custody and visitation arrangements for children from violent homes, because judges currently have little guidance in applying the best-interests standard in these cases, especially in cases involving domestic violence. Footnotes