skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 183461 Find in a Library
Title: Analysis of the United Nations Data Set on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems: Part I
Author(s): R. W. Burnham
Date Published: November 1998
Page Count: 32
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 97-MU-CX-0002
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of the data collected by the United Nations on crime and criminal justice since the mid-1970’s focuses on the nature and quality of the data set, issues related to analyzing data collected in different countries, interpretation issues, and the uses and limitations of the data.
Abstract: The data set includes a separate file for each year. Each file contains all the variables and cases for that year. The United Nations collected the data in five different sweeps, which covered 1970-74, 1975-80, 1980-86, 1986-90, and 1990-94. Issues related to reliability and underlying validity appear to vary from both case to case and variable to variable. Thus, the data are useful for suggesting and refining questions for further study, but not with any authority for activities hypothesis testing, which demand statistical rigor. Difficulties related to analyzing data across countries, cultures, or jurisdictions relate to definitions, recording practices, operating practices, factual inequalities, and crime recording. However, the use of ratios within countries is not vulnerable within countries. Data from different countries on attrition as a case progresses from recording through case processing through to imprisonment demonstrates the use of the data set. Using the data to analyze the precise amount of change in any variable from year to year is inappropriate. Appropriate uses include: (1) the development of descriptions of the dynamics of the main components in the criminal justice process; and (2) the generation of hypotheses. Organizations should use the data set for research and particularly to develop more precise questions. In addition, the National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics should urge the United Nations to improve data quality, even if the trade-off is less data quantity. Figures and appended technical details
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): BJS final report; Crime in foreign countries; Criminal justice research; Data analysis; Data collections; Data integrity; Databases; Foreign crime statistics; Foreign criminal justice systems; United Nations (UN)
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.