skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 183643   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: National Evaluation of the COPS Program: Title I of the 1994 Crime Act, Research Report
  Document URL: Text PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Jeffrey A. Roth ; Joseph F. Ryan ; Stephen J. Gaffigan ; Christopher S. Koper ; Mark H. Moore ; Janice A. Roehl ; Calvin C. Johnson ; Gretchen E. Moore ; Ruth M. White ; Michael E. Buerger ; Elizabeth A. Langston ; David Thacher
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 292
  Series: NIJ Research Report
  Annotation: This research report presents evaluation findings based primarily on the first 4 years of the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program.
Abstract: The COPS program resulted from Title I of the 1994 Crime Act, an act that encouraged State and local law enforcement agencies to increase the number of sworn police officers on the street and to adopt community policing. The act authorized nearly $9 billion over 6 years to achieve these objectives. The program evaluation defined successful implementation of COPS initiatives as based on problem-solving, building partnerships with the community, and participating in crime prevention programs. The program evaluation sought to determine how the COPS program affected levels of community satisfaction with the police, fear of crime, social and physical quality of life, and levels of serious crime. Specific questions asked in the course of program evaluation focused on how local agencies responded to the COPS program, the distribution of COPS funds, police hiring and deployment, the implementation of technology, increases in policing levels, the extent to which program grantees built partnerships with communities and participated in problem-solving and crime prevention activities, and the extent to which grantees supported and sustained community policing. Detailed program evaluation methods and findings are presented, but overall conclusions of the program evaluation are: (1) The COPS program advanced the adoption of community policing, although community policing had different meanings in different jurisdictions; (2) Problem-solving partnerships were common in many police agencies visited, but these partnerships were often in name only or temporary working arrangements; (3) Most police agencies were engaged in problem-solving, although the form and visibility of problem-solving techniques varied by police agency; and (4) Significant crime prevention efforts were observed, primarily manifested as traditional crime prevention programs subsumed under the community policing label. An appendix provides additional information on methods used in the program evaluation. References, tables, and figures
Main Term(s): Police crime-prevention
Index Term(s): Police effectiveness ; Police community relations ; Program evaluation ; Community policing ; Problem-Oriented Policing ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0073
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.