skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 184774     Find in a Library
Title: Offender Race and Case Outcomes: Do Crime Seriousness and Strength of Evidence Matter? Final Activities Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Cassia Spohn
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 46
  Annotation: The primary objective of this study was to provide a more comprehensive test of the liberation hypothesis by examining the effect of race on a series of case processing decisions and by comparing case outcomes for black and white offenders charged with a variety of felonies.
Abstract: Building on the liberation hypothesis, the study predicted that, in more serious cases, the appropriate sentence would be strongly determined by crime seriousness and the defendant's prior criminal record. The data file used in the study included information on charging, convicting, and sentencing decisions in North Carolina for 1,378 defendants charged with felonies in 1978 and 1,280 defendants charged with felonies in 1981. The effect of race on eight different case outcomes was explored--three pretrial decisions, two convicting outcomes, and three sentencing decisions. Data were analyzed using both ordinary least squares regression and logistic regression. The analysis did not uncover any evidence of systematic racial discrimination in North Carolina. Race directly affected only one of the eight case outcomes. Although black defendants were more likely than white defendants to be convicted of a felony rather than a misdemeanor, they did not face significantly higher or lower odds of pretrial detention, conviction on any charge, incarceration, or imprisonment. The sentences imposed on blacks and whites who were incarcerated were also similar. On the other hand, the study found evidence of contextual discrimination. Race effects, when they did surface, tended to be confined to cases in the middle category of the offense seriousness scale. Findings provide support for the liberation hypothesis and for the contention that conflict theory does not necessarily predict blacks will be treated more harshly than whites. 40 references, 3 notes, and 7 tables
Main Term(s): Court research
Index Term(s): Black/African Americans ; Caucasian/White Americans ; Sentencing disparity ; Racial discrimination ; Criminal justice research ; Black/White Crime Comparisons ; Race-crime relationships ; Race-punishment relationship ; NIJ grant-related documents ; North Carolina
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 96-IJ-CX-0036
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.