U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Returning Justice to the Community: The Indianapolis Juvenile Restorative Justice Experiment

NCJ Number
186304
Author(s)
Edmund F.. McGarrell; Kathleen Olivares; Kay Crawford; Natalie Kroovand
Date Published
June 2000
Length
68 pages
Annotation
This report describes the implementation and the initial results of an experiment on the use of restorative justice conferences (The Indianapolis Juvenile Restorative Justice Experiment) as an alternative response to early law-breaking by young offenders.
Abstract
Restorative justice conferences bring the offending youth, the victim, and the supporters of both offender and victim together to discuss the incident and the harm brought to the victim and to the group of supporters. Conferences provide the opportunity for victims to explain how they have been harmed and to ask questions of the offending youth. Supporters of both victims and offenders have the opportunity to describe how they have been affected by the incident and their concerns about the youth's behavior. Conferences end with a reparation agreement in which all the participants reach an agreement on how the youth can make amends to the victim and the community. This report presents the practical and theoretical rationale for restorative justice conferences, describes the development of the Indianapolis project, and presents the initial findings from the first stage of this ongoing experiment. This first stage involved youths age 14 and younger with no prior court adjudications. The experimental design used random assignment procedures that provided comparisons between victims, offending youths, and parents involved in conferences, as well as those involved in other court-ordered diversion programs. For the total sample, youths who participated in conferences were significantly less likely to have been rearrested 6 months after the initial incident. The rate of rearrest was 20 percent for program youths compared to 30 percent for the control group. This constituted a 40 percent reduction and is statistically significant. For the total sample, youths who participated in conferences were also less likely to relapse 12 months after the initial incident. 16 tables, 7 figures, and 37 references