skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 186736   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Barnstable House of Correction Residential Substance Abuse Treatment: A Process Evaluation
  Document URL: PDF 
  Corporate Author: BOTEC Analysis Corporation
United States of America
  Date Published: 12/2000
  Page Count: 78
  Annotation: A process evaluation of the drug treatment program in the Barnstable House of Correction in Massachusetts used both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to describe and assess the program, the participants and selection process, program completions and terminations, and compliance with known principles of effective drug treatment.
  Abstract: The program operated in two units (Prep and Shock Units), each of which housed 40 men and had a military-style setting. Inmates spent 4-8 weeks in the Prep Unit and then moved to the Shock Unit, where they completed a 3-month, 36-sessin rotation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Group. Inmates had a total of 6 months of drug treatment. The program blended 12-step programming with cognitive-behavioral therapy and social skills training. The evaluation took place during March-December 1999. Information came from program records, a review of the program curriculum and other materials, interviews with relevant staff and an outside vendor, focus groups with inmates, and informal observations of the program. Results revealed that 26 percent of the 309 entries into the program during the 1-year evaluation period resulted in graduation, 41 percent were terminated by staff, 29 percent were released early, 2 percent dropped out, and 2 percent were still in the program at the time of analysis. The program has successfully incorporated 13 of the 18 recognized principles of effective drug treatment programs and has partially achieved the remaining 5 principles. Recommended actions to improve the program’s operation include increasing human services and custody staff by one full-time position each, continuing or initiating training for all staff in cognitive-behavioral therapy, better informing inmates about the program before they enter it, and establishing written classification eligibility criteria for inmates moving into the Shock unit. Additional recommendations, tables, figures, appended background on the management information system, and 44 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections policies
  Index Term(s): Program implementation ; Inmate drug treatment ; Program design ; Treatment techniques ; Drug abuse in correctional facilities ; Treatment effectiveness ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Massachusetts
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 1998-RT-VX-K006
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

BOTEC Analysis Corporation
103 Blanchard Avenue, 1st Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Description
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: See NCJ-186733 for the executive summary
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=186736

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.