U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

New York City Police Department's "Stop & Frisk" Practices: Report to the People of the State of New York From the Office of the Attorney General, Executive Summary

NCJ Number
187332
Date Published
December 1999
Length
13 pages
Annotation
A study begun in March 1999 focused on the New York City Police Department’s use of the investigative technique known as stop and frisk and sought to determine its practice throughout the city and its potential impacts on minority communities and individuals.
Abstract
Data came mainly from approximately 175,000 forms that police officers were required to complete after a variety of stop encounters during 1998 and the first 3 months of 1999. The analysis determined the frequency of stops in various police precincts and compared the rates at which members of different racial groups were stopped during the study period. Results revealed that black persons comprised 25.6 percent of the city’s population and 50.6 percent of persons stopped. Hispanics comprised 23.7 percent of the population and 33.0 percent of the stops. In contrast, white persons comprised 43.4 percent of the population and only 12.9 percent of the stops. Precincts where minorities accounted for the majority of the population tended to see more stop and frisk activity than precincts where whites were the majority. Only one of nine stops resulted in an arrest. Further analysis revealed that 61.1 percent of a sample of 15,000 forms contained factual bases that were sufficient to justify a stop based on reasonable suspicion, 15.4 percent of the forms did not provide sufficient information to justify a stop, and 23.5 percent did not allow a determination of whether reasonable suspicion existed. The analysis concluded that this study is the first stage of a process that will include further contacts and discussions with the police agency and a dialogue with the agency and with scholars, community leaders, members of the organized bars, and others regarding the findings and the potential need for changes. Footnotes