skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 187769     Find in a Library
Title: Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Young Offenders
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
Author(s): Edmund F. McGarrell Ph.D.
Date Published: 08/2001
Page Count: 12
  Annotation: A evaluation conducted in Indianapolis by the Hudson Institute with funding from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention assessed the use of restorative justice conferences for juvenile delinquents ages 14 years or under in Indianapolis.
Abstract: Implementation of the Restorative Justice Conferencing Experiment in Indianapolis began on September 1, 1997. Participants were 14 years old or younger, were first-time offenders who had committed a nonserious and nonviolent offense, had no other pending charges, and admitted responsibility for the offense. The 458 youths who took part in the experiment included 232 assigned to the restorative justice treatment group and 226 to the control group. The research used both process and outcome measures. Results revealed that the conferences lasted an average of 43 minutes, the reintegration ceremony averaged 10 minutes from the close of the conference, and conference coordinators generally followed the principles of restorative justice conferencing. Apology was included in 62 percent of reparation agreements; other common elements included monetary restitution, personal service, and community service. Victim satisfaction was higher in the conference group than in the control group. Satisfaction levels of youth and parents in both groups were generally high. The completion rate was higher for the conference youth (82.6 percent) than for the control group (57.7 percent), who were assigned to other diversion programs. Six-month rearrest rates were significantly lower for the treatment group than for the control group, but the difference at 12 months was not statistically significant. The analysis concluded that these findings and earlier research provide support for continued development of the restorative justice conference approach and experimentation with its use. Tables, figures, endnotes, and 20 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
Index Term(s): Juvenile court diversion ; Juvenile delinquency prevention ; Restitution ; Alternative dispute settlement ; Services effectiveness ; Victim-offender reconciliation ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness ; Juvenile diversion programs ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention Decisionmaking ; Criminal Justice System Response to Victims ; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System ; Family conferencing ; Indiana
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 96-JN-FX-0007
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.