skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 188085   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Treatment Services in Adult Drug Courts: Report on the 1999 National Drug Court Treatment Survey
  Document URL: Text PDF 
Author(s): Elizabeth A. Peyton ; Robert Gossweiler Ph.D.
Corporate Author: National Consortium of TASC Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 05/2001
Page Count: 142
  Annotation: This report presents the findings and the implications of a 1999 survey to determine substance abuse treatment services and other treatment services currently used by adult drug courts and to identify significant issues faced by adult drug courts in obtaining and delivering high-quality comprehensive treatment services.
Abstract: Questionnaires were distributed to 263 operating adult drug courts, and 212 courts responded (81 percent). The survey was conducted in October 1999. The survey findings showed that treatment services designed for and used by drug courts comported with scientifically established principles of treatment effectiveness. Overall, the structure of drug court treatment is consistent with the principles established by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (1999) and is delivered according to the Drug Court Key Components and related Performance Benchmarks. A broad continuum of primary treatment services is available to drug courts. An analysis of the findings concludes that drug courts can cooperate with treatment providers and administrators, TASC programs, and other offender management efforts to generate sufficient resources and support at the local, State, and national levels to incorporate drug court activities into a larger strategy for managing substance-involved justice populations. This movement will provide the foundation for an effective, community-based strategy to reduce the drug use and criminal activity of the significant number of substance-involved offenders who are burdening our systems and our society. Drug courts can be more successful and attain greater impact by continuing to improve operations and expand to larger and more significant populations. Among the policy recommendations was that drug courts should establish and formalize more effective linkages with local service delivery systems and State and local alcohol and drug agencies. Also, States and localities should explore the development of drug court treatment standards. Further, drug court professionals and drug court treatment providers need skill-based training and technical assistance to improve engagement and retention of participants. Drug courts should implement effective management information systems to monitor program activity and improve operations; and they should improve the methods and protocols for screening, assessing, and placing participants in treatment. 33 figures, 3 tables, appended study instruments, and 50 references
Main Term(s): Drug Courts
Index Term(s): Drug treatment programs ; Court information systems ; Drug treatment ; Court management
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Progams
Drug Court Programs Office
United States of America
Grant Number: 1999-DC-VX-K002
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Progams
Drug Court Programs Office
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Type: Survey
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Drug Courts Resource Series. See NCJ-188086 for the executive summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.