U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Effects of Social Ties on Crime Vary by Criminal Propensity: A Life-Course Model of Interdependence

NCJ Number
189323
Journal
Criminology Volume: 39 Issue: 2 Dated: May 2001 Pages: 321-348
Author(s)
Bradley R. Entner Wright; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E. Moffitt; Phil A. Silva
Date Published
May 2001
Length
28 pages
Annotation
This article develops the hypothesis that the effects of social ties on crime vary as a function of individuals’ propensity for crime.
Abstract
Previous studies have explained the transition from criminal propensity in youth to criminal behavior in adulthood with hypotheses of enduring criminal propensity, unique social causation, and cumulative social disadvantage. An additional hypothesis derived from the life-course concept of interdependence was presented: the effects of social ties on crime vary as a function of individuals’ propensity for crime. These four hypotheses were tested with data from the Dunedin study in which a multidisciplinary team gathered age-appropriate measures of low self-control, social ties, and crime in a longitudinal study that spanned from childhood to young adulthood. Attesting to enduring criminal propensity (hypothesis 1), the study members who displayed the lowest self-control went on to commit the most crime, even when controlling for the social ties that they formed. Attesting to unique social causation (hypothesis 2), the social ties formed by study members significantly deterred (or promoted in the case of delinquent peers) their criminal behavior, even when controlling for their levels of self-control. Attesting to the process of cumulative social disadvantage (hypothesis 3), study members with low self-control experienced significantly less education, employment, family ties, and partnerships and more delinquent peers. Each of these changes in social ties, in turn, increased criminal behavior. Finally, attesting to life-course interdependence (hypothesis 4), prosocial ties deterred crime, and antisocial ties promoted crime, most strongly among the low self-control study members. The evidence for life-course interdependence proved to be robust, holding up across different measures of self-control, social ties, and criminal behavior. 4 figures, 4 tables, 1 note, 46 references, and 2 appendices.