skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 189586 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Process Analysis of GDC RSAT Program, Draft Final Report
Author(s): Audrey Moffett
Corporate Author: Wellsys Corporation
United States of America
Date Published: July 2000
Page Count: 180
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Wellsys Corporation
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
Grant Number: 99-RT-VX-K008
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Wellsys Corporation
4708 Elam Forest Dr.
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report described findings of the process evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program operating within the Georgia Department of Corrections.
Abstract: The process evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program of the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC), federally funded and conducted by the Wellsys Corporation, examined the RSAT program in sufficient detail so that the GDC had the information necessary to assess the program’s quality, efficiency, and effectiveness and provided needed contextual framework for an outcome evaluation of the program. There are 7 RSAT programs operating at 4 prisons in the GDC system (Scott, Macon, Calhoun, and Pulaski) with a total of 310 beds available for program participants. The methods and data sources utilized included interviews with GDC and Spectrum Health Services/CiviGenics (an independent vendor of health services operating in the GDC and administering the RSAT program) staff, examination of computerized databases, observation at service delivery sites, and examination of a variety of written materials and research. The findings suggested that the RSAT program was operating in a way reflective of its design and the intent of its designers. The program’s actual structure, setting, and content conformed to what was originally proposed. Program benefits showed lower rates of institutional misconduct and significant attitudinal and behavioral change as participants progressed through the program. Weaknesses focused on the selection and referral processes and the lack of sufficient aftercare services upon graduation and release from prison. There was a lack of communication between various entities within the GDC and a lack of knowledge concerning the RSAT program among diagnostic and classification staff. Specific program recommendations included: (1) address deficiencies with the MIS system allowing more complete and comprehensive data collection, retrieval and reporting features; (2) implement a standardized system of identifying inmates’ degree of substance use and involvement; (3) refine and simplify the referral process; (4) address and resolve issues between various GDC units and the parole authorities; and (5) substantially increase the opportunities available for aftercare upon release. Appendices
Main Term(s): Inmate drug treatment
Index Term(s): Correctional institutions (adult); Drug treatment programs; NIJ grant-related documents; Post-release programs; Program evaluation
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.