skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 189675 Find in a Library
Title: Rethinking Sentencing
Journal: Corrections Management Quarterly  Volume:5  Issue:3  Dated:Summer 2001  Pages:34-40
Author(s): Martin F. Horn
Editor(s): Stephanie Neuben
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 7
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article proposed the use of explicit and transparent sentences and making offenders responsible for their release and their success by equipping them with the tools necessary for success to enhance public safety.
Abstract: The result of sentencing failure was the overuse of imprisonment and flawed release practices and procedures and reentry. It was proposed that while offenders were in prison they be offered the opportunity to learn the competencies they would need to succeed and release them back to the community in a graduated style. If all corrections professionals did was supervise offenders, it would ensure continued recidivism. This article presented four major propositions. First, imprisonment should be reserved for the incapacitation of dangerous people, retribution for troubling crimes, and as the most severe punishment to preserve and emphasize social norms. Second, the length and nature of a prison sentence should be fixed at the time of sentencing in all its elements (they must be explicit and transparent). Third, discretionary parole decision making should be abolished because it is obsolete and inconsistent and replaced with a personal responsibility model. Fourth, the preceding propositions offer an opportunity to rethink the role and operation of a prison as an enhancer of public safety to one that empowers inmates to, “hold the key” to their freedom through their behavior. The current system of parole places responsibility for success or failure of an individual on the state, instead of the offender. It was suggested that research agenda be redirected to determine what accelerates success by those released and how to build those accelerants into the criminal justice system. References
Main Term(s): Sentencing reform
Index Term(s): Correctional institutions (adult); Correctional reform; Parole outcome prediction; Recidivism causes; Sentence effectiveness; Social reintegration
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.