skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 189733   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Profiling Inmates in the Los Angeles County Jails: Risks, Recidivism, and Release Options
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Joan Petersilia ; Susan Turner ; Terry Fain
Corporate Author: Rand Corporation
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2000
Page Count: 107
  Annotation: One in a series of RAND studies on the impact of truth-in-sentencing and other "get tough" policies on State and local corrections, this study profiled the inmates in the Los Angeles jail system in early 1996, in order to determine which might be suitable candidates for intermediate sanctions.
Abstract: By analyzing data from a full census of almost 22,000 inmates, as well as a randomly selected sample of 1,000 pre-adjudicated inmates, the study obtained limited offense and demographic information on the entire census, as well as detailed data on the prior records and post-release criminal behavior for the sample of 1,000 inmates. Data used in this report were extracted from automated information systems maintained in Los Angeles County and the hand-coded abstractions of official records. The study found that on January 15, 1996, there were 21,758 inmates in custody of the Los Angeles Jails; 11,967 were pre-adjudicated, and 9,971 were adjudicated. On the day of the census, 87 percent of all jail inmates were male and 13 percent were female; the average age was 32 years. The study determined that the Los Angeles jails were occupied almost entirely by persons charged or convicted of current felony offenses, combined with extensive criminal records. Thus, the jails now housed only the "worst of the worst," and competition for scarce jail beds seemed to be increasing. The study concluded that few inmates currently housed in Los Angeles Jails were good candidates for intermediate-sanctions programs; and jail capacity should be expanded to permit lengthier incarceration for the more dangerous pre-adjudicated and post-adjudicated inmates. There were few in the system who should be selected for diversion programs, and those given intermediate sanctions should receive more surveillance and treatment under enhanced conditions. For long-range planning, the study recommends that Los Angeles County develop an ongoing ability to simulate various criminal justice policies and the effects they would have on criminal justice agencies. Such a sentencing simulation or "population projection" model could take into account changes in demographics, crime rates, police arrest practices, length of sentences imposed, and projected time served. 12 figures, 19 tables, and 31 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Violent inmates ; Judicial diversion ; Jails ; Dangerousness ; Inmate characteristics ; Intermediate sanctions ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 96-CE-VX-0018
Publication Number: DRU-2394-NIJ
Sale Source: Rand Corporation
1776 Main Street
P.O. Box 2138
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.