skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 189734   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Dangerousness and Incapacitation: A Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Kathleen Auerhahn
  Date Published: 09/2000
  Page Count: 323
  Annotation: This predictive evaluation of sentencing policy reform in California concludes that the State's "Three Strikes" law will not be effective in incapacitating dangerous offenders, and it recommends alternatives to guide policymakers in constructing and implementing sentencing policies that will effectively target and incapacitate dangerous offenders.
  Abstract: Sentencing policies that claim to enhance public safety by selectively incapacitating dangerous offenders must make clear the characteristics of a dangerous offender and must ensure that these dangerous offenders are actually the ones targeted for selective incapacitation. In discussing the history of efforts to predict "dangerousness," this study notes the limited success of these endeavors. Sentencing innovations such as Three Strikes and Truth in Sentencing aim to select the most dangerous offenders for lengthy incarceration, thereby isolating them from society; however, due to structural constraints (the availability of prison space), the net effect of these laws may be a reduction in the aggregate level of dangerous offenders in the prison population, as more dangerous offenders who are not subject to mandatory minimum sentences are released to make room for "Three Strikes" and other mandatorily sentenced offenders. In the current analysis, "dangerousness" is used as an evaluative construct to estimate the level of dangerousness in correctional populations. The modeling strategy used consists of measuring certain characteristics of individuals known to correlate with dangerousness. The level of dangerousness in a population is defined as the mean level of dangerousness in individuals that comprise the population. The dangerousness construct as measured in individuals takes the form of an additive index that consists of the following variables: age, gender, number of prior felony convictions, the presence or absence of violent prior felony convictions, and current conviction offense. This study conducted a simulation analysis to reproduce the compositional dynamics of the California criminal justice system during the period 1979-98, so as to determine whether the system had been successful in incapacitating dangerous offenders. The findings showed that the dangerousness of incarcerated populations in California had decreased rather than increased in the last two decades, while the dangerousness of noncustodial populations had either remained relatively constant (parole) or increased dramatically (probation). The principal trends were the aging of incarcerated populations and the increased influx of drug offenders into the system. Three alternate scenarios are presented to explore various ways to achieve greater average dangerousness in the incarcerated population, thus increasing the incapacitation of dangerous offenders. The first two of the scenarios accept the fact of an aging prison population and examine ways to focus the Three Strikes law more narrowly on particular types of offenders (those who have shown a capacity for violence either in the past or in the current offense). The third alternative would implement a program of geriatric release in California prisons. 65 figures, 5 tables, and 403 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections policies
  Index Term(s): Mandatory Sentencing ; Trend analysis ; Convicted offender incapacitation ; Corrections effectiveness ; Dangerousness ; Sentencing reform ; Selective incapacitation ; Inmate characteristics ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Three Strikes Laws ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 99-IJ-CX-0043
  Sale Source: University of California, Riverside
4045 Canyon Crest Drive
Riverside, CA 92502
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.