skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 190725     Find in a Library
Title: What Policymakers Need To Know To Improve Public Defense Systems
Series: BJA Bulletins
Author(s): Tony Fabelo
Corporate Author: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government
United States of America
Date Published: 12/2001
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 1999-DD-BX-K002
Sale Source: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States of America
Document: Text PDF 
Type: Instructional Material
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper establishes sets of questions to aid policymakers in assessing the value and effectiveness of their public defense systems.
Abstract: Two major obstacles to improving public defense systems are the lack of data and lack of systemic policy analysis that State policymakers need to address the relevant issues regarding public defense. Examination of the limited literature in this area reveals the inadequacy of empirical research related to improving public defense systems. This paper proposes that policymakers and researchers develop a strategy for formulating relevant inquiries and then obtaining current data to assess the effectiveness of a State's public defense systems. Until a comprehensive body of knowledge is established and analyzed, reforms in public defense systems will continue to be difficult. The research should provide the knowledge to develop standards for providing quality public defense services; determine funding needed in a locality for a public defense system to meet agreed upon standards; monitor compliance with standards; design and measure performance to justify investments in public defense; and determine operational procedures that can be improved to increase performance. The research agenda should examine the structural characteristics of the public defense system first, i.e., those that make it independent, determine workload capacity, and examine how to organize and prepare for its work. Next, the research agenda must examine the quality of services provided, using notification time, access to counsel, and overall quality of representation. Finally, research must define and measure outcomes of public defender systems. Assessments must determine whether a given public defender system helps the judicial system process cases faster; provides better pretrial and sentencing alternatives; provides better coordination of support services; increases public confidence in the justice system; and decreases the errors that deny defendants' rights, without increasing public safety risks. This paper includes the "Ten Commandments of Public Defense Delivery Systems," developed by James Neuhard, Director of the Michigan Appellate Defender Office, and Scott Wallace, Director of the Defender Legal Services for the National Legal Aid and Defender Association. 12 sources for more information and 14 notes
Main Term(s): Court personnel
Index Term(s): Indigents ; Legal aid services ; Evaluation measures ; Public defenders ; Research uses in policymaking ; BJA grant-related documents ; Indigent Defense
Note: "Public Defense," December 2001, Bulletin #2; this is one in a series of papers developed with some of the leading figures in public defense during their periodic meetings at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=190725

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.