skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 194106   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Three Strikes Revisited: An Early Assessment of Implementation and Effects
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Peter W. Greenwood ; Susan S. Everingham ; Elsa Chen ; Allan F. Abrahamse ; Nancy Merritt ; James Chiesa
Date Published: 08/1998
Page Count: 100
  Series: NIJ Research Report
  Annotation: This document examines the 4 year experience with the three strikes law in California.
Abstract: The goals of the study were to ask whether crime and incarceration rates in California and other three strikes States had changed faster than in other States, why California’s prison population had not increased more rapidly, how the law had affected the criminal justice system. The three strikes law invokes an extended sentence (often life in prison) following three instances of conviction of sufficiently severe crimes. Twenty-five States, as well as the Federal Government, have adopted some version of the “three-strikes-and-you-are-out” law. The laws vary widely across States in terms of the definition of “strike,” the conditions under which the sanctions of the law may be triggered, and the severity of the sanctions. In most States, the laws are narrow, targeting a specific group of particularly dangerous repeat offenders. The California law is quite broad and differs from most others in two ways: sentence enhancements apply when the defendant has only one prior conviction for a serious crime, and the current felony offense that triggers the enhancements need not be serious. Findings showed that States with three strikes laws did not appear to have experienced faster declines in crime or a greater increase in incarceration rates than States without such laws. In California, the prison population had increased but no faster than before the law was implemented. Increases in the incarceration rate per conviction (possibly the result of the three strikes law) and in the number of arrests per crime were offset by a decrease in the crime rate. In California, the law has not resulted in dramatic workload increases for all prosecutors and courts. Effects on the number of jury trials and on case backlogs have varied from county to county. Such variations may reflect differences in how counties have implemented the law. In some counties, strikes are being dismissed in a quarter to a half of all strike eligible cases. References, appendices
Main Term(s): Three Strikes Laws ; California
Index Term(s): Habitual offenders ; Conviction records ; Recidivists ; Legislation ; State laws ; Career criminal programs ; Crime rate studies
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0009
Publication Number: DRR-1905-NIJ
Sale Source: Rand Corporation
1776 Main Street
P.O. Box 2138
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Description
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.