skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 194126   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Process Evaluation of Recent Juvenile Transfer Statutes in Virginia, Volume I Final Report
Series: NIJ Research Report
Corporate Author: ICF International (formerly Caliber Associates)
United States of America

Virginia Dept of Juvenile Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 115
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-JR-VX-0003
Sale Source: ICF International (formerly Caliber Associates)
9300 Lee Highway
Fairfax, VA 22031
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report includes a literature review of the process of and practices of juvenile transfer to criminal court, an overview of recent Virginia juvenile transfer statutes, a process evaluation of these statutes, trends in Virginia's juvenile transfer practice, factors that influence transfer decisions in Virginia, and a qualitative and quantitative study of key decision-makers' attitudes toward juvenile transfer.
Abstract: The literature review notes that all States and the District of Columbia have at least one of three principal mechanisms by which a juvenile's case can be transferred to criminal court: judicial waiver, prosecutorial discretion, or statutory exclusion. The literature review focuses on the evolution of current transfer practices, the implementation of transfer provisions, factors that affect transfer decisions, and dispositions and sentencing outcomes. In Virginia, as a result of the Juvenile Justice Reform Package of 1996, there are now three different procedures for transferring a juvenile to adult court. The criterion for determining which procedure to use is the offense with which the juvenile is charged; the legislation thus increases the power of the prosecutor in the transfer decision. Two new procedures were created for transferring a juvenile, the automatic certification and the prosecutorial certification, in addition to the traditional means of having the juvenile court decide whether the offense is sufficiently serious to warrant transfer. Automatic and prosecutorial certifications both sidestep any consideration of whether the juvenile is a "proper person" to remain in the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. The enactment of these provisions can be viewed as a movement toward greater mechanization in juvenile justice laws and a consequent movement away from juvenile justice's traditional focus on individualized decision-making. The process evaluation of the recent juvenile transfer statutes in Virginia examined the concordance between the Virginia Code requirements and transfer decision-making practice. Descriptive information is provided on measures that relate to juvenile transfer practice. First, with the increase in crime rates, the number of violent-crime arrest rates has been down since 1995. The numbers of those who were transfer-eligible for automatic waiver has been fairly stable; the number eligible for prosecutorial waiver has been down since 1997. The number of convicted offenders under 18 years old in the circuit court increased between 1996 and 1997. A number of current and prior-record factors were found to be significantly related to the certification decision. These included the seriousness of the current offense, victim-related factors, weapon use, and the offender's prior-record information. Judicial and prosecutorial decision-makers varied in their attitudes toward the transfer process; both groups considered the current and prior offense to be the most important factors in a case, but judges were more likely to be concerned about treatment options, the offender's age, and the juvenile's safety in adult correctional facilities. Areas are identified for future study. Extensive exhibits, 33 references, and appended site visit coding form and the questionnaire for the survey of judges and prosecutors
Main Term(s): Juvenile court waiver
Index Term(s): Judicial discretion ; Prosecutorial discretion ; Juvenile codes ; State laws ; Juvenile justice policies ; NIJ final report ; Virginia
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=194126

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.