In 1990, 2 large victim studies were conducted simultaneously in East and West Germany, and included respectively 4,999 and 2,027 randomly selected respondents of at least 14 years. In 1995, questionnaires focusing on victimizations within the past year were administered in East and West Germany, including 4,202 and 16,493 respondents respectively. Some of the hypotheses of these studies were: (1) that the fear of crime could be broken down into emotional fear and a cognitive estimate or risk; (2) fear in both Germanys was dependent on gender, previous victimizations, size of community, income, educational attainment, and age; (3) an earlier crime victimization has a greater impact on fear than does age; and (4) the crime-fear paradox is at best marginally useful. Results showed that the crime-fear paradox, if valid at all, held only for young women and elderly male victims. Young women show greater emotional fear than the rest, though this fear was grounded in their heightened risk of victimization especially from sexual crimes, though unlike other groups, their fear exceeded their sense of risk. With men fear of crime fell as they moved into middle age, but from middle age on it climbs again -- slowly in West Germany but sharply in East Germany. In East Germany men in late middle age showed the greatest fear, but in West Germany the oldest group did. It appeared that criminality and its after-effects explained this pattern. If one regards fear of crime within the context of lifestyle, a fear of crime can be readily understood as part of a broader fear. Victims always experience more fear of crime than non-victims. Emotional fear among West German non-victim females fell gradually with advancing age until it finally moved higher in the very oldest group. The level of emotional fear among non-victim men in both East and West Germany climbed broadly with advancing age. 3 tables, 7 figures, 9 notes, 62 references