U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Efficacy of Rape Trauma Syndrome Evidence: Implications for Policy and Research, Part II

NCJ Number
194626
Journal
Sex Offender Law Report Volume: 2 Issue: 6 Dated: October/November 2001 Pages: 81-82,93-95,96
Author(s)
Douglas D. Koski; Roslyn Myers
Date Published
2001
Length
6 pages
Annotation
This article explores rape trauma syndrome (RTS) in criminal cases. Currently, juries are not instructed on RTS.
Abstract
Rape trauma syndrome (RTS) is not understood by juries because they are not instructed on it by the judge. This is especially true in cases where there is no physical injuries, suggesting that possibly a rape did not occur. An example may be of a trial where the defendant claims the victim consented to sexual intercourse. As might be expected, the victim's credibility can come into play when reaching a verdict. Just as judges can instruct the jury regarding RTS, he or she may also instruct the jury that the character of the victim cannot be considered in reaching a verdict. RTS is considered a form of social scientific data and needs to be considered when reaching a verdict. References

Downloads

No download available

Availability