skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 195792   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Domestic Violence, Visitation and Custody Decisions in New York Family Courts, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Chris O'Sullivan Ph.D.
Corporate Author: Safe Horizon
United States of America
Date Published: 05/2002
Page Count: 60
  Annotation: This study investigated the frequency of visitation and custody appeals by batterers and documented the response of the court when an abusive partner applied for visitation.
Abstract: Child protective services tend to hold mothers accountable for the harm to children of witnessing intimate partner violence despite the fact that women are more often the victims of physical abuse than men. Battered women can be charged with neglect for failure to protect their children from witnessing violence. Victims of domestic abuse can face loss of custody of their children if they do not separate from the abusive partner. Ironically, when a woman does separate from an abuser who is the father of her children, the court may grant his petition for visitation. A review of Family Court records in New York City and suburban Westchester County was conducted. The hypotheses were that (1) increased awareness of the impact of domestic violence on children would limit court-ordered access to children by a parent who had abused the other parent; and (2) the court was aware that domestic violence was typically a behavior pattern with a history of abuse and the probability of continuing abuse. In New York City, the findings indicate that family offense petitions and protection orders had little or no impact on the courts’ decisions regarding visitation and custody. The courts were granting visitation in most cases when there was evidence or an allegation of ongoing violence or threats by one parent against the other. In Westchester County, 51 percent of fathers enjoined by a protection order were granted visitation. Fathers were significantly more likely to be granted visitation in both New York City and Westchester County when they were enjoined by a protection order than when no family offense petition had been filed. The evidence suggests that visitation should be denied more often--at least as a temporary measure. Judges seem reluctant to suspend or deny visitation, and instead may resort to delaying tactics. The problem of visitation and custody in domestic violence cases certainly warrants further investigation. 28 references
Main Term(s): Domestic assault ; Judicial attitudes ; Parental visitation rights
Index Term(s): Marital problems ; Child abuse ; Home environment ; Domestic relations ; Family offenses ; Parental rights ; Child custody
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0021
Sale Source: Safe Horizon
2 Lafayette Street
New York, NY 10007
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: See NCJ-195793 for the Executive Summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.