skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 196056     Find in a Library
Title: Hiring and Working With an Evaluator
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Stan Orchowsky ; Taj Carson ; Merideth Trahan
  Editor(s): Nancy Michel
Corporate Author: Juvenile Justice Evaluation Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 16
  Annotation: This briefing addresses how a juvenile justice program manager can go about hiring a qualified evaluator to assist in evaluating a program's performance.
Abstract: This briefing contains specific information concerning who is an evaluator, what an evaluator can do, advantages and disadvantages of hiring an evaluator, selecting an evaluator, developing an evaluation plan, specifying evaluation products, maximizing collaboration, and concludes by identifying other evaluation resources. An evaluator is described as someone who has received formal training in research and/or evaluation and has experience in conducting evaluations. It is noted that there are presently no certifications, license requirements, or college degrees for this skill area. The selection of an evaluator includes identifying their formal education; their experience in research and working with programs; their evaluation philosophy, for example, whether it is primarily as a researcher or as an outside expert; and their communication skills. Facilitation, research, data analysis, and program development are the knowledge base of an effective evaluator. Advantages of hiring evaluators include bringing specialized knowledge and ability, objectivity, and credibility perspective to the project. Disadvantages include cost to the project; time, as they interview and collect data; and possible lack of expertise resulting in damage to program reputation. The development of an evaluation plan requires a written list of responsibilities be required of the evaluator to avoid confusion and duplication of effort, clearly defined products to be obtained by the evaluation process, and a final written formal report to be provided at the end of the project by the evaluator. Collaboration between the evaluator and the program staff must be maximized, to avoid reluctance to participate on the part of the staff, and to assure implementation of all phases of the plan for a relevant and useful final evaluation. Other evaluation resources recommended are Federal agencies, State agencies, local agencies, colleges and universities, professional organizations, and websites.
Main Term(s): Juvenile program evaluation
Index Term(s): Evaluation ; Juvenile procedures training ; Juveniles ; Evaluation measures
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 98-RN-FX-0112
Sale Source: Juvenile Justice Evaluation Ctr
c/o Justice Research and Statistics Assoc
777 North Capitol Street, N.E.
Suite 801
Washington, DC 20002
United States of America
Type: Training (Handbook/Manual)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Program Evaluation Briefing Series #2
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.