skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 198428     Find in a Library
  Title: Disproportionate Minority Confinement: A Review of the Research Literature From 1989 Through 2001
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Carl E. Pope ; Rick Lovell ; Heidi M. Hsia
  Date Published: 2002
  Page Count: 24
  Annotation: This bulletin reviews studies of disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of juveniles that have been published in professional academic journals and scholarly books from March 1989 through December 2001.
  Abstract: Similar to an earlier research summary (Pope and Feyerherm, 1990), the current review focuses on empirical research studies of the official processing of minority youth, defined by the U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention as African-Americans, American Indians, Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics. The studies reviewed examined an array of processing points and outcomes, including arrest, detention, petition, adjudication, and disposition. Disposition (20 studies) and petition (13 studies) were the most frequently examined processing points; more than half (18) of the studies examined multiple decision points in juvenile justice processing. The majority of the studies reviewed (25 out of 34) reported race effects in the processing of youth. Taken together, the research findings support the existence of disparities and potential biases in juvenile justice processing; however, the causes and mechanisms of these disparities are complex. Important contributing factors may include inherent system bias, effects of local policies and practices, and social conditions (inequality, family situation, or underemployment) that may place youth at risk. Overrepresentation may also result from the interaction of a number of factors. This review shows that the body of knowledge concerning DMC is growing, albeit slowly, and the research is increasing in complexity. It highlights the diversity present across the studies in terms of perspectives, approaches, designs, definitions, and measures. This bulletin concludes with guidelines for further research in this area and recommendations for a national policy agenda regarding DMC research. 34-item bibliography
  Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
  Index Term(s): Sentencing disparity ; Racial discrimination ; Juvenile case disposition ; Minority overrepresentation ; OJJDP grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
  Contract Number: 97-JN-FX-K002
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Literature Review
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Downloaded January 2, 2003.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.