U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Class I Impacts: Work During Incarceration and Its Effects on Post-Prison Employment Patterns and Recidivism

NCJ Number
200000
Author(s)
Elizabeth K. Drake
Date Published
February 2003
Length
31 pages
Annotation
This study examined how in-prison employment during incarceration impacted inmates in terms of in-prison behavior, post-prison employment patterns, and recidivism.
Abstract
A total of 424 offenders residing within the Washington State Department of Corrections who held Class I jobs while incarcerated were compared to a total of 403 offenders who were not employed during incarceration. Class I jobs are those that involve a contract between the Department of Corrections and a private sector business. The comparison group matched the test group in terms of sex, offense, age, race, and number of years incarcerated. Findings indicate that in-prison behavior was not impacted by in-prison employment; there was no significant difference in the rate of infractions received between the two groups. In terms of post-release employment, those offenders who participated in Class I industries had a higher rate of employment than the control group. However, the top three predictors of obtaining employment after release from prison were being a drug offender, being a sex offender, and having at least a high school education. Furthermore, for both the test group and the control group, younger offenders were more likely to gain employment upon release than were older offenders. Class I participants earned higher wages within 1 year of release than did offenders who did not engage in Class I industries while incarcerated. Finally, the results revealed that the test group recidivated at a lower rate than the control group; 17 percent and 24 percent, respectively. Also, Class I participants who gained employment upon release had a lower recidivism rate than Class I participants who did not gain employment upon release. Overall, the study indicates that those offenders involved in Class I employment while incarcerated fared better than did their unemployed counterparts. The only category in which there was no difference between the test group and the control group was in infractions, indicating that offenders who were employed were no different from unemployed offenders in terms of in-prison behavior. Recommendations for future research includes the use of a pre-post quasi-experimental design in order to further isolate and understand the effects of in-prison employment on inmate outcomes. Tables, references