U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Re-offending After Victim-offender Mediation in Juvenile Court Proceedings (From Restorative Justice in Context: International Practice and Directions, P 208-228, 2003, Elmar G. M. Weitekamp and Hans-Jurgen Kerner, eds. -- See NCJ-201195)

NCJ Number
201206
Author(s)
Dieter Dolling; Arthur Hartmann
Date Published
2003
Length
21 pages
Annotation
This chapter discusses a research project on re-offending rates among defendants that had taken part in model tests on victim-offender mediation (VOM) in the criminal justice system in Germany.
Abstract
The VOM cases were analyzed as a complete census; every mediation case falling into the period of time being investigated was analyzed. The extent of data collection for the sample was determined by statistical considerations. For Munich, inquiries to the Federal Penal Registration Office have been made for 209 VOM and for 575 control cases; for Landshut, for 145 VOM and for 89 control cases. Those cases were regarded as successful in this study where mediation led to an agreement between offenders and victims. There were hardly any differences in offense between the VOM cases and those of the control group. There were significant differences in family circumstances and the number of times there was an official diversion or conviction among the VOM group and the control group. The VOM group did not comprise adolescent defendants, and the findings of this study refer to young defendants 18- to 21-years-old. The results revealed a favorable influence of VOM on re-offending. With the successful mediation cases, the average number of re-offendings was 1.36, as opposed to 2.06 with the control sample. This relation was also confirmed by a partial correlation where the influence of control variables was eliminated. With a partial correlation coefficient of 0.14, this correlation was not very strong; however, it was significant. The extent of the favorable effect of VOM on re-offending was not fully quantifiable in this study. Fears that the preventive effect of criminal law could be weakened by VOM are not supported by these results. 24 tables, 1 note, 4 references