skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202398 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluability Assessment: Examining the Readiness of a Program for Evaluation
Author(s): Deborah Kaufman-Levy; Mary Poulin
Corporate Author: Justice Research and Statistics Association
United States of America
Date Published: May 2003
Page Count: 16
Sponsoring Agency: Justice Research and Statistics Association
Washington, DC 20002
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Ctr
Washington, DC 20002
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 98-RN-FX-0112;
Sale Source: Juvenile Justice Evaluation Ctr
c/o Justice Research and Statistics Assoc
777 North Capitol Street, N.E.
Suite 801
Washington, DC 20002
United States of America
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document introduces program managers to the concept of "evaluability assessment," which involves determining whether a program evaluation is justified, feasible, and likely to provide useful information.
Abstract: In determining whether a program is ready for evaluation, the evaluability assessment (EA) should focus on the program's design or implementation. Regarding program design, two major flaws can render a program incapable of being evaluated, i.e., no formal program design or model is in place, or the program design or model is unsound. In the EA's focus on program implementation, four questions should be answered: Does the program serve the population for whom it was designed? Does it have the resources discussed in the program design? Are the program activities being implemented as designed? Does the program have the capacity to provide data for an evaluation? One section of this document describes five tasks that must be completed in performing an EA. First, study the program history, design, and operation; second, watch the program in action; third, determine the program's capacity for data collection, management, and analysis; fourth, assess the likelihood that the program will reach its goals and objectives; and fifth, show why an evaluation will or will not help the program and its stakeholders. In the concluding section of this document, program managers are advised that they can ensure their programs are appropriate for evaluation by determining that their programs are serving those individuals and groups they intended to serve, that they are collecting relevant data in an organized and consistent fashion, that they are staffed with people who have the appropriate qualifications and knowledge, and that the program activities are being implemented as designed. If all of these components are in place, a program will most likely qualify for an evaluation. 5 references and appended sample interview questions for an EA of a juvenile justice program
Main Term(s): Juvenile program evaluation
Index Term(s): Evaluation criteria; Evaluation utilization; OJJDP grant-related documents
Note: Program Evaluation Briefing Series #6
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.