skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202746 Find in a Library
Title: Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, P 143-195, 2003, Michael Tonry, ed., -- See NCJ- 202743)
Author(s): Anthony N. Doob; Cheryl M. Webster
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 53
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Hardbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines one aspect of general deterrence -- the effects of sentence severity on crime.
Abstract: Substantial evidence exists that the overall justice system deters crime. This essay examines the existence of an association between sentencing severity and levels of crime. A useful way of testing a particular supposition is by distinguishing between the research hypothesis (that a relationship between two variables exists) and the null hypothesis (that there is no association between these same factors). The problem with this approach is that one cannot logically prove the absence of a phenomenon. Social scientists have been cautious in accepting the null hypothesis that sentence severity does not reduce levels of crime. A large number of studies are examined to determine the deterrent effects of variations in sentence severity, and discern trends over time, providing insights into the stability of results. The majority of these reviews do not support the claim that harsher sanctions deter. The studies that have found support for the notion that harsher sentences deter are relatively few in number. They also suffer from one or more serious methodological, statistical, or conceptual problems that render their findings problematic. The null hypothesis that variation in sentence severity does not cause variation in crime rates should be conditionally accepted. Deterrence-based sentencing makes false promises to the community. As long as the public believes that crime can be deterred through harsh sentences, there is no need to consider other approaches to crime reduction. Sentencing systems that do not subscribe to general deterrence already exist in several nations such as Finland and Canada. 5 tables, 70 references
Main Term(s): Criminal justice research; Deterrence
Index Term(s): Crime control theory; Crime prevention measures; Punishment; Sentence effectiveness; Sentencing trends; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202746

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.