U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: 2003 Report of Findings, Executive Summary

NCJ Number
203795
Author(s)
Robert Hornik; David Maklan; Diane Cadell; Carlin H. Barmada; Lela Jacobsohn; Vani Henderson; Anca Romantan; Robert Orwin; Sanjeev Sridharan; Adam Chu; Carol Morin; Kristie Taylor; Diane Steele
Date Published
December 2003
Length
33 pages
Annotation
This report is the executive summary of an evaluation of the current phase (Phase III) of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign (September 1999-June 2003), which involved the dissemination of advertising through a full range of media following a communications strategy developed by and later revised by the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).
Abstract
The primary tool for the evaluation was the National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), which is collecting initial and follow-up data from nationally representative samples of youth between 9 and 18 years old, as well as parents of these youth. This report presents analyses from the first seven waves of NSPY. Also included in the report are statistics on the level of exposure to messages achieved by the Media Campaign during Phase III. For Phase III, advertising space was purchased on television, radio, newspapers, magazines, billboards, transit ads, bus shelters, movie theaters, video rentals, Internet sites, Channel One broadcasts in schools, and other appropriate venues. The focus was on the negative consequences of marijuana use. The NSPY found that most parents and youth recalled exposure to campaign anti-drug messages. Overall, there was evidence of some favorable campaign effects on four of five parental belief and behavior outcome measures, including talking with children about drugs, doing fun activities with children, and beliefs about monitoring children. There was little evidence of direct favorable campaign effects on youth, either for the marijuana initiative period or for the campaign as a whole. 12 tables and 2 references