skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 208804     Find in a Library
Title: Alternatives to the Secure Detention and Confinement of Juvenile Offenders
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): James Austin ; Kelly Dedel Johnson ; Ronald Weitzer
Date Published: 09/2005
Page Count: 41
  Series: OJJDP Juvenile Justice Practices Series
  Annotation: This bulletin presents a model procedure for reducing the number of juvenile offenders in secure detention and confinement, so as to reduce crowding in custodial facilities and improve the effectiveness of juvenile case management.
Abstract: "Secure detention" refers to the holding of youth, upon arrest, in a juvenile detention facility in order to ensure the youth's appearance for all court hearings and to protect the community from future offending. "Secure confinement," on the other hand, involves the placement of adjudicated youth in correctional facilities due to sentencing for periods that range from a few months to several years. Secure-confinement facilities generally have a broader array of resident programs than detention facilities. Alternatives to secure detention and confinement are needed for a number of reasons, two of which are to reduce crowding in such facilities and to improve the effectiveness of juvenile programming in reducing recidivism. This bulletin discusses four approaches for expanding the use of alternatives to secure detention and confinement through systems change: special program initiatives, new legislation that requires changes in current agency practices, administrative reforms, and litigation that addresses violations of juvenile offenders' constitutional rights. The bulletin also discusses objective classification and risk assessment as means for ensuring that case-management decisions carefully measure the risk and needs of each offender, so that placement decisions best meet offender and community needs. Examples of alternatives to secure detention and confinement are also profiled, and features are identified for programs that are most effective in deterring juvenile crime and addressing the root causes of delinquency. Most of these programs do not involve secure custodial settings, but rather work with youth in their communities. 62 references, and appended examples of 8 State assessment and placement systems
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention Decisionmaking
Index Term(s): Juvenile detention ; Juvenile correctional facilities ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Juvenile offender classification ; Effects of juvenile imprisonment ; Juvenile detention reform ; Juvenile detention decisionmaking
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: OJP-2000-298-BF
Sale Source: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Technical Assistance
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Downloaded September 30, 2005.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.