U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Portrait of Detained Youth in the State of Hawaii

NCJ Number
209290
Journal
Crime & Delinquency Volume: 51 Issue: 2 Dated: April 2005 Pages: 180-191
Author(s)
Angela M. Wolf; Christopher Hartney
Date Published
April 2005
Length
12 pages
Annotation
This study identified the characteristics of the predominantly Asian or Pacific Islander (API) youth held in Hawaii's only youth detention facility and examined their recidivism rate for 2 years following their first release.
Abstract
The study conducted a descriptive analysis of demographic, arrest, and commitment characteristics of juveniles detained for the first time between 1995 and 1998. In addition to quantitative data collection, informal one-on-one interviews and small focus groups were conducted with 16 key stakeholders in the detention facility. Of the 247 youth detained between 1995 and 1998, 81 percent were male. Hawaiian or part-Hawaiian youth composed 51.3 percent of the juveniles. The remaining juveniles were Filipino (7.9 percent), Samoan or other Pacific Islander (7.5 percent), Caucasian (6.7 percent), Asian (3.8 percent), African-American (1.7 percent), and "mixed" or "other" (21.3 percent). Gang membership was reported by 26.8 percent of the youth, with most ethnic groups being equally likely to be in a gang, except for Samoans of other Pacific Islanders (66.7 percent were gang members). Hawaiians or part-Hawaiians were somewhat less likely to be in a gang. Just over 64 percent of the youth reported a history of assaultive behavior, and 92.4 percent of all youth had used at least one illicit drug. Of the 247 juveniles involved in the study, 193 were arrested at least once in the 2 years following release from their first commitment (rate of 78.1 percent). In addition to being incarcerated in facilities designed for more serious offenders, these short-term youth lacked any continuity of services from commitment through release into the community. Many of these youth could be safely diverted from detention if community-based options were available. 1 table, 5 figures, and 12 references