Part I offers an explanation for why the issue of convictions of innocent persons in capital cases has become so prominent in the current debate over the death penalty compared to the low priority given this issue in the debate in the 1960s and 1970s. The authors offer the explanation that the focus on innocence as a tactic for building support for the abolition of the death penalty is rooted in the belief that the harm of punishing innocents resonates with the public because most Americans can empathize with the harms they fear could happen to themselves, rather than those that happen only to "bad people." Part II questions the normative distinctiveness of innocence as a priority problem in the administration of capital punishment compared with other more endemic problems, such as disproportionate, arbitrary, or discriminatory imposition of the death penalty. Part III questions the strategic value of focusing on innocence as the prime mover toward the reform or abolition of capital punishment. 134 notes