The theories and principles that underlie family conferencing apparently offer young women more meaningful involvement in key juvenile justice decisionmaking, the creation of new opportunities for community involvement, and respect for the integrity and dignity of the offender; however, in practice, women apparently have difficulty completing community-based orders, which are typically part of family conferencing agreements. Some difficulties that female juveniles have under the format of family conferencing are talking about their offending due to their sense of shame and self-blame; their careful management of what they tell about themselves and their experiences, to whom, and when; and their reluctance to share their feelings with others without a context for building a relationship of trust with them. For these and other reasons, research on girls' reactions to family conferencing have tended to be less favorable than those of boys. Generally, girls were less likely to feel they were consulted about the process, tended to have less positive responses to victims, were more likely to feel they were not treated fairly and were viewed as untrustworthy, and were less likely to believe that they had been forgiven or were being given another chance. These findings suggest that girls may feel more like victims than offenders in terms of their experiences in the community and in the juvenile justice system. This means that victims, family members, community representatives and other participants in family conferences with girls must be prepared to show support for girls who may have been abused, blamed, and shamed in past experiences in the family, the community, and the juvenile justice system. 19 references