U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reentry Planning for Mentally Disordered Inmates: A Social Investment Perspective

NCJ Number
212411
Journal
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Volume: 41 Issue: 2 Dated: 2005 Pages: 21-42
Author(s)
Nancy Wolff; J. R. Bjerklie; Tina Maschi
Date Published
2005
Length
22 pages
Annotation
This study calculated cost estimates for 3 reentry investments, using data on the population (n=2,715) of male mentally disordered inmates in New Jersey prisons on August 10, 2002.
Abstract
Currently, the New Jersey Department of Corrections does not provide reentry planning for male inmates with special needs. This required that an estimate of the cost of such programming be calculated by drawing on the experience of reentry and case-management programs operating in other States. Different assumptions were used for the distribution of treatment needs and criminal characteristics within the population of male mentally disordered offenders, ranging from equal treatment needs and placement difficulties to different treatment needs and difficulties in accessing community-based resources due to past criminal behavior. The costs of these investments ranged from about $700,000 to $934,000 per year for approximately 500 released inmates, with costs approaching the lower end of the range if the coordination and supervision period was shortened and standardized. These estimates do not take into account undiagnosed and/or untreated mental illness within the general population of New Jersey prisons. The authors advise that reentry programs serve a single function, i.e., to coordinate community-based services for the purpose of facilitating community reintegration after imprisonment; however, if the community-based services needed by the released prisoner do not exist or are inaccessible to him, then reentry planning will not be cost-effective, but it will expose the gaps in services and treatment that will ultimately influence reoffending behavior. 5 tables and 34 references