skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 213475     Find in a Library
Title: Hardest Sell?: Problem-Solving Justice and the Challenges of Statewide Implementation
Author(s): Greg Berman
Corporate Author: Ctr for Court Innovation
United States of America
Date Published: 2004
Page Count: 12
Sale Source: Ctr for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article provides an overview of the problem-solving approach to criminal justice and offers strategies for replicating some of the problem-solving practices in conventional criminal courts.
Abstract: Focus groups comprised of 35 judges from New York and California determined that 5 main problem-solving practices could be replicated in conventional courts: (1) problem-solving orientation; (2) provision of integrated social services; (3) interaction with defendants; (4) judicial monitoring; and (5) breaking down the adversarial nature of traditional criminal justice. Two main obstacles to implementing problem-solving practices in conventional courts were also identified: (1) a lack of resources, and (2) the philosophical departure from traditional notions of law and order. A problem-solving approach involves a significant shift in judicial orientation to allow one court to hear a wide range of criminal, family, and civil complaints that would usually be dealt with in separate courts. This approach recognizes that legal and social problems are often intertwined and seeks to deal with both types of problems. The approach links defendants and victims with an array of social services and requires sanctions that improve the community, such as graffiti cleanup. The article also presents six long-term strategies to aid in the transition to a problem-solving court system; these include, (1) using data to improve operations and promote accountability within the court system; (2) educate court personnel on the problem-solving approach to justice; (3) provide incentives to personnel who participate in problem-solving practices; (4) ongoing research and development; (5) infuse law school curricula with problem-solving principles; and (6) develop a communications strategy to support the implementation of problem-solving court systems.
Main Term(s): Court reorganization ; Court structure
Index Term(s): Family courts ; Court system
Note: Downloaded March 16, 2006.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=234973

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.